USPTO serial 79300479
KEEP STICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KEEP STICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Sterilizers using UVC LED; sterilizers; apparatus for disinfection; disinfectant apparatus; air sterilizing apparatus; air cleaner, not being parts of machines; sterilizers for household purposes; sanitary apparatus and installations; sterilizing apparatus for medical purposes; disinfection apparatus for medical purposes; cooking apparatus and installations; pocket warmers; disinfectant dispensers for toilets; footwarmers, electric or non-electric; coils [parts of distilling, heating or cooling installations]; air-conditioning apparatus and instruments; air cooling apparatus and instruments; ventilation apparatus and instruments; non-electric lighting apparatus and devices; heating apparatus and devices for laboratory use; lighting apparatus for vehicles; milk sterilizers; lighting apparatus and installations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 17, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 12, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 11, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |