USPTO serial 79301299
TRESOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUYKENDALL, LYNDSEY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRESOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs, recorded; computer programs [downloadable software]; computer software, recorded | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Computer aided transmission of messages and images; communication by computer terminals; electronic mail; message sending; providing internet chatrooms; rental of message sending apparatus; transmission of digital files | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Website hosting services and software as a service featuring software for file management, computer security, data management, and rental of software; cloud computing; data duplication and conversion services, data coding services; information technology security, protection and restoration services, namely, computer security threat analysis for protecting data; recovery of computer data; hosting services, software as a service, and rental of software; data security consultancy; internet security consultancy; administration of user rights in computer networks; user authentication services using single sign-on technology for online software applications; digital watermarking; cloud computing services, namely, private cloud hosting provider service; cloud computing services, namely, public cloud hosting provider service; consulting in the field of cloud computing networks and applications; encryption of messages; encryption of digital images; encryption, decryption and authentication of information, messages and data; decoding of data; data encryption and decoding services; data encryption services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |