Drawing for C CITIBEATS

USPTO serial 79301336

C CITIBEATS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 802
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CHUNG, DIANA ALANA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with C CITIBEATS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Data processing services;updating and maintenance of data on computer databases; analysis of market research data and statistics; analysis of market research data; business data analysis; compilation of data in computer databases; compilation of mathematical data for business and market purposes; compilation of information in computer databases; data processing, systematization and management into computer databasesACTIVE
042Development, programming and implementation of software; platforms for artificial intelligence as software in the form of a service [SaaS] services featuring software for analyze documents in real-time to provide insightful structure data to big decision-makers; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software with deep neural network software to understand social needs in real time to help decisions makers to create public policies based on actionable information; software as a service [SaaS] services featuring software to understand how society changes in real time; research in the field of artificial intelligence; provision of online, non-downloadable artificial-intelligence computer programs on data networks to analyze unstructured data through machine learning and natural language processing development and maintenance of computer database software; data decoding; data duplication, conversion and encryption services not for physical dataACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2026ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
May 26, 2026NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 26, 2026PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 21, 2026GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
May 20, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 6, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 6, 2026OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 25, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 22, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 22, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 22, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 17, 2026ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Nov 11, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 10, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
May 9, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 4, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Oct 29, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 12, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 6, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 18, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 22, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 21, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 1, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 1, 2022OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 18, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 18, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 18, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 9, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 8, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 8, 2021ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Nov 24, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 24, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 24, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Nov 18, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 18, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 18, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Nov 15, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 15, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 15, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Nov 13, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 28, 2021ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 28, 2021LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW
Jul 17, 2021LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 7, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 18, 2021RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 18, 2021RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 15, 2021RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 14, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 8, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 4, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 31, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance