USPTO serial 79301845
HOFFMANN ARCHITECTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRELL, STEVEN WAYNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOFFMANN ARCHITECTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Architectural services for the design of office facilities; professional consultancy relating to architecture; architectural and engineering services; architectural consultancy; architectural services for the design of buildings; consultancy and information services relating to information technology architecture and infrastructure; research relating to architecture; preparation of reports relating to architecture; architectural services for the design of retail premises; architectural services; architectural services for the design of office buildings; consultancy in the field of architecture and construction drafting; design and development of computer hardware architecture; architectural and urban planning services; architectural project management; design services for architecture; architectural research; computer aided design services relating to architecture; architectural services for the design of shopping centers; architectural services for the preparation of architectural plans; providing information in the field of interior design via a website; design services relating to architecture; architectural design services in the fields of traffic and transportation; design and development of computer software architecture; architectural services for the design of commercial buildings; architectural services for the design of industrial buildings; interior architectural services; design services for furniture; design of boats; product design; design of cars; automotive design; architectural design services relating to exhibitions; aircraft design; product design and development; visual design; new product design; interior design; design services for the interior of buildings; industrial art design; research relating to design; design of motor vehicles; design of vehicles and vehicle parts and components; design for others in the field of clothing; shopfitting design consultancy services; office furniture design; design of land vehicles; advisory services relating to industrial design; design services; kitchen design services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 15, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |