USPTO serial 79302047
ORÉE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORÉE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Services for providing food and drink; restaurant, bar and catering services; bistro services; preparation of take-out foods and beverages; cafe, brasserie, cafeteria services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | FINP | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2021 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 28, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 26, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 25, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |