Drawing for RISING TIDE

USPTO serial 79302216

RISING TIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARR, PATRICK C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RISING TIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AMY COHEN HELLER

Amy Cohen Heller Law Office of Amy Cohen Heller, LLCP.O. Box 1065Deerfield, IL 60015UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Provision of financial aid in the nature of grants for social and charitable organizations; financial sponsorship in the nature of grants to support social assistance programs and initiatives; financial support of educational institutions by awarding of scholarships and grants, namely, providing financial support in the nature of grants to non-profit entities that assist people from disadvantaged countries for the purpose of facilitating educational opportunities; financial support in the nature of grants for programs aimed at promoting classical liberal ideas and a self-determined lifestyleACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 19, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 19, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 19, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 19, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 7, 2022EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 10, 2022EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 7, 2022GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 18, 2022DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 16, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 5, 2022DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2022CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 4, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 15, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 15, 2022OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 3, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 3, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 3, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 3, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 3, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 20, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 22, 2021RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2021RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 15, 2021RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 14, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 15, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance