USPTO serial 79303565
REVOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REVOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kaitlyn Garvin
Kaitlyn Garvin Saunders & Silverstein LLP14 Cedar Street, Suite 224Amesbury, MA 01913UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Teaching in the field of motorcycles; motorcyclist club services; providing training in the field of motorcycles; entertainment services, namely, entertainment services in the nature of organizing, arranging, and hosting social entertainment events; organizing community sporting and cultural events; entertainment services, namely, conducting contests; entertainment services, conducting parties; organizing events in the field of motorcycles for educational purposes; night club services; publication of periodicals; publication of manuals; publication of journals; organization of exhibitions for motorcyclist clubs; organizing and arranging exhibitions for entertainment purposes; entertainment services, namely, displaying a series of films; entertainment, namely, live music concerts; cinema theaters; organizing events in the field of film for cultural or educational purposes; organization of sports competitions; vehicle driving instruction; conducting workshops in the field of motorcycles and motorcyclist clubs; providing information about education, exercise training, entertainment, sporting and community cultural activities; providing on-line information about education, exercise training, entertainment, sporting and community cultural activities; publication of texts, other than publicity texts; electronic publication of texts and printed matter, other than publicity texts, on the Internet; photographic reporting; multimedia publishing of magazines, journals and newspapers; publication of books and magazines; publication of educational and training guide books; all the above except for soccer and football related activities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 24, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 26, 2022 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |