USPTO serial 79303581
ROLLAND CONSEILS ET PRESTATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OJEYEMI, ASHLEY CHRISTINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROLLAND CONSEILS ET PRESTATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages except beers; ciders; digestifs, liqueurs and spirits; wines; spirits [beverages]; alcoholic extracts or essences | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business strategy consulting services in the field of wine tasting and wine growing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research work in the field of oenology; wine analysis services in the context of a scientific laboratory, all the aforesaid services particularly in the field of oenology, viticulture and packaging techniques; scientific laboratory services; quality control; design and development of computer hardware and software | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Information relating to oenology and advice on oenology and tasting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROLLAND CONSEILS ET PRESTATIONS
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named ROLLAND CONSEILS ET PRESTATIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 20, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |