CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BRACE

USPTO serial 79303660

BRACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEASER, ANDREW C
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey J. Banyas

Jeffrey J. Banyas Edwin A. Sisson, Attorney at Law, LLC303 N. Court St., PO Box 867Medina, OH 44258UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Glue guns, electric; screwdrivers, electric; electric hand drills; angle burnishing machine; dust exhausting installations for cleaning purposes; snow ploughs; mixing machines; curtain drawing devices, electrically operatedABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2023FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 31, 2023FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2023FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2022MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 31, 2022ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 21, 2022EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2022GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2022OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 24, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2022OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 19, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 20, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 29, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 28, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 18, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 18, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 18, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 17, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 23, 2021RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2021RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 21, 2021RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 20, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 9, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance