USPTO serial 79303835
S1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARR, PATRICK C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with S1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lenny R. Jiang
Lenny R. Jiang Paratus Law Group, PLLC1765 Greensboro Station PlaceSuite 320Tysons Corner, VA 22102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Hip joint endoprostheses; bone graft materials being synthetic bone grafts; implants for osteosynthesis being Implants consisting of artificial materials; medical instruments for application on animal bodies, namely, medical instruments for application on animal bodies; substitutes for bones, cartilage, ligaments, and tendons, namely, Implants consisting of artificial materials; artificial bone parts to be implanted in natural bones; biodegradable bone fixation implants; bone graft substitutes, being synthetic bone grafts, for plastic surgery; medical apparatus and instruments for plastic surgery; artificial bone implants made of ceramics being Bone implants composed of artificial materials; bone graft substitutes, being synthetic bone grafts, for veterinary purposes; medical apparatus and instruments for use in surgery; grafts for surgical use, namely, artificial vascular grafts; transplant prostheses for use in surgery, namely, Orthopaedic hip prostheses; medical apparatus and instruments other than for dental purposes, namely, Medical imaging apparatus; medical bone graft materials, namely, Synthetic bone grafts; otolaryngological biomaterials, namely, Artificial biomaterials for augmentation of bone and tissue for medical purposes; otolaryngological medical apparatus and instruments being Otolaryngology instruments; artificial bones for implantation; hip joint implants and their parts made of artificial materials; surgical implants comprised of artificial materials; bone prostheses; bone implants comprised of artificial materials; endoprostheses; implants consisting of artificial materials; artificial orthopedic implants, namely, Orthopedic joint implants made of artificial materials; medical apparatus and instruments, namely, Medical apparatus for detecting cancer; implants comprised of artificial materials for dental purposes; bone graft substitute, being synthetic bone grafts, for dental purposes; dental implants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 27, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 26, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |