USPTO serial 79303856
E-WORKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARMON, RAYMOND E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-WORKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Duane M. Byers
Duane M. Byers Nixon & Vanderhye PC901 N. Glebe Road, 11th FloorArlington, VA 22203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Earth moving machines being excavators; hydraulic excavating machines; excavators being excavating machines; machines being concrete mixers; combined skips and mixers for producing concrete; all the foregoing goods are human driven goods, not robotically driven goods, and all the foregoing goods are sold via authorized distributors | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | Tractors for agricultural purposes; tractors; all the foregoing goods are human driven goods, not robotically driven goods, and all the foregoing goods are sold via authorized distributors | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 23, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 16, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |