USPTO serial 79304513
AROMAMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAW, CHRISTOPHER M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AROMAMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Aromatics [essential oils]; oils for perfumes and scents; oils for cosmetic purposes; oils for perfumes and scents; essential oils / ethereal oils; essential oils of citron; aromatics [essential oils]; ethereal essences; incense; geraniol; essential oils of cedarwood; lavender oil; almond oil; rose oil; safrol; badian essence; breath freshening preparations for personal hygiene; mouthwashes, not for medical purposes; dental bleaching gels; breath freshening sprays; cleaning preparations; perfumery; aloe vera preparations for cosmetic purposes; cosmetics; balms, other than for medical purposes; adhesives for cosmetic purposes; cleaning preparations; lotions for cosmetic purposes; massage gels, other than for medical purposes; cosmetics for children; fragrancing preparations; room fragrancing preparations; potpourris [fragrances]; incense; joss sticks; bergamot oil; deodorants for pets; shampoos for pets [non-medicated grooming preparations]; cobblers' wax; lacquer-removing preparations; detergents, other than for use in manufacturing operations and for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail services connected with the sale of subscription boxes containing cosmetics; mail order retail services for cosmetics; online retail store services relating to cosmetic and beauty products; retail services relating to fragrancing preparations; wholesale services in relation to fragrancing preparations; wholesale services in relation to toiletries; online retail services for downloadable and pre-recorded music and movies; advertising services relating to the sale of goods; advertising particularly services for the promotion of goods; retail services in relation to cleaning preparations; retail services in relation to toiletries; retail services in relation to cleaning articles; retail services in relation to hygienic implements for humans; retail services in relation to beauty implements for humans; retail services in relation to hair products; retail services in relation to animal grooming preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |