Drawing for SAILMAX

USPTO serial 79304516

SAILMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SAILMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARCUS A. FISCHER

MARCUS A. FISCHER COOPER LEGAL GROUP, LLC6505 ROCKSIDE ROAD, SUITE 330INDEPENDENCE, OH 44131UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Inner tubes for pneumatic tires; repair outfits for inner tubes, namely, patches for repairing inner tubes and adhesive rubber patches for repairing inner tubes; tires for commercial vehicles; tires for agricultural vehicles; bus tires; truck tires; automobile tires; casings for pneumatic tyres; pneumatic tires; inner tubes for automobile tiresABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2023FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 4, 2023FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2023FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 8, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 20, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2022OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2022MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 4, 2022ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 4, 2022OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 4, 2022OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 25, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 23, 2021OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 20, 2021OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2021OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Aug 19, 2021ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 30, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 10, 2021RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 10, 2021RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 9, 2021RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 8, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 19, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance