Drawing for ECOSPECS

USPTO serial 79304614

ECOSPECS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOSPECS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Molly T. Eichten

Molly T. Eichten Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd.8300 Norman Center DriveSuite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55437-1060

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Eyewear; sunglasses; reading glasses; spectacles; goggles; lenses, frames and nosepieces for eyewear, sunglasses, reading glasses and spectacles; cases and pouches specially adapted for eyewear, sunglasses and spectacles; structural parts and fittings for all of the aforesaid goodsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2023FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 20, 2023FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2023FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2022MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 20, 2022ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 17, 2022EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2022ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2021GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 8, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 8, 2021OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 8, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 19, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2021RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2021RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 19, 2021RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 18, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2021LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 11, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2021LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Feb 23, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 19, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance