Drawing for TOPFIL

USPTO serial 79304796

TOPFIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DETMER, CAROLYN ROSE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TOPFIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CLIFFORD D. HYRA

CLIFFORD D. HYRA FRESH IP PLC11710 PLAZA AMERICA DRIVE SUITE 2000RESTON, VA 20190UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029fruit-based fillings for baked goods; fruit-based fillings for baked goods also containing fruit pieces; fruit-based fillings for cakes and pies; fruit-based fillings for cobblers; fruit pie fillings; the aforesaid explicitly excluding whipped toppings; all the aforementioned goods exclusively sold to culinary professionals, and/or in commercial sizes and quantitiesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2025LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 4, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 14, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2023MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 14, 2023ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 14, 2023OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 14, 2023OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 8, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 20, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2022OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2022RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 18, 2022OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 16, 2022OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2022OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Dec 14, 2021ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 27, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2021RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2021RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 19, 2021RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 18, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 8, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2021LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2021SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance