Drawing for COREPLATE

USPTO serial 79304910

COREPLATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with COREPLATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pamela N. Hirschman

Pamela N. Hirschman Sheridan Ross P.C.1560 Broadway, Suite 1200Denver, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Laboratory instruments for cell reproduction and analysis, namely, plates having multi-well arrays that can be used in chemical analysis, biological analysis or patterning for scientific, laboratory or medical research use that incorporate semiconductor sensors or processing units in each cavity; Cell culture apparatus for laboratory use, namely, multi-well high-density microelectrode array (HD-MEA) plates that incorporate semiconductor sensors or processing units in each cavity; Medical laboratory research instruments based on multi-well array for improving in vitro cell-based screening outputs that incorporate semiconductor sensors or processing units in each cavity; laboratory instruments for cell reproduction and analysis, namely, single-cavity and multi-cavity plates in the nature of plates having multi-well arrays that can be used in chemical analysis, biological analysis or patterning for scientific, laboratory or medical research use that incorporate semiconductor sensors and processing units in each cavityACTIVE—
010Medical cell sample collection devices, namely, single-cavity and multiple-cavity plates in the nature of plates having multi-well high-density microelectrode arrays (HD-MEA) that incorporate semiconductor sensors or processing units in each cavity; medical cell or tissue sample collection devices, namely, single-cavity and multiple-cavity plates in the nature of plates having multi-well arrays that can be used in chemical analysis, biological analysis or patterning specially adapted for use with medical diagnostic apparatus for testing cell cultures, organoids, spheroids, explanted tissues and other kinds of cell and tissue samples, in medical laboratories and laboratories close to patients for diagnostic and medical purposes, incorporating semiconductor sensors and processing units in each cavityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2023FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 28, 2023FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2023FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2022OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 28, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 13, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 13, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 30, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2021RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2021RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 19, 2021RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 18, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 2021CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Apr 3, 2021CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 5, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 1, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance