USPTO serial 79305131
QUANTUM ASSISTED DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAZICH, JOAN MICHELE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUANTUM ASSISTED DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Carbons for catalysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Application software for cloud-computing-services; simulation software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultancy in the field of scientific research; cloud computing; professional advice on technology; professional advice on technology; professional advice in relation to software development; technological consultancy relating to computers; technological consultancy relating to computer hardware; professional advisory services relating to computer software; research in the field of computer programming; research in the field of materials science; research in the field of molecular science; research in the field of pharmaceuticals; research and development in the field of chemistry; research and development in the field of physics; research and development in the field of pharmacy and biotechnology; research and development of computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2022 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 5, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 4, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |