USPTO serial 79305261
CEMAS CENTRO MUNDIAL DE VALÈNCIA PARA LA ALIMENTACIÓN URBANA SOSTENIBLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SIRIGNANO, EMMA MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CEMAS CENTRO MUNDIAL DE VALÈNCIA PARA LA ALIMENTACIÓN URBANA SOSTENIBLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising; commercial business management; commercial administration; office functions; promoting and providing consulting services regarding sustainable commercial solutions focused on public awareness of agriculture and sustainable food; promotion and management services relating to municipal initiatives in the field of agriculture and sustainable food; organization of trade fairs, pageants and exhibitions for commercial purposes; promotion and management of public interest projects and especially related to agriculture and sustainable food; collection and systematization of data in a central file; management of computer files, all relating to agriculture and sustainable food | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Publication and dissemination of scientific documents relating to agriculture and sustainable food; dissemination of educational material; publication of documents in the field of training, science, public legislation and social affairs in the field of agriculture and sustainable food; organization and conducting of training workshops, colloquiums, conferences, congresses, seminars and symposiums, in particular relating to agriculture and sustainable food; publication of newspapers; publication of magazines; publication of texts (except advertising texts); information relating to training and teaching; exploitation of electronic publications online; publication of books; publication of documents; electronic publication of books and periodicals online; organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes and organization of competitions (education or entertainment), in particular relating to agriculture and sustainable food | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 20, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 19, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |