USPTO serial 79305463
BOSCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, ALINA S.
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOSCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NICHOLAS D. WELLS
NICHOLAS D. WELLS LEGENDS LAW GROUP, PLLC330 N MAIN STKAYSVILLE, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Blade sharpening machines being stropping machines; Sharpening machines; Agricultural machines, namely, Motorized cultivators, harvestors, harrows, seeders; Agricultural implements other than hand-operated, namely, cultipackers, tilling machines for agricultural use; Compressed air machines; Cutters being machines, namely, fodder cutting machines, saws, and cutters; Lawnmowers being machines; Lawn cutters being lawn mowing machines; Electric chaff cutters; Knives for mowing machines; Electric chaff cutter blades; Power operated cultivators being machines; Harvesting machines, namely, harvesters for agricultural purposes; Mowing and reaping machines; Tools being parts of machines, namely, Grinding tools, reamers; Power saw blades being parts of machines; Machine tools, namely, milling cutters, powered machines for cutting or shaping or finishing metals or other materials; Motorized cultivators; Pulverizers being machines for pulverizing and crushing of soil; Power-operated atomizers being machines for industrial or commercial use; Power-operated industrial atomizers for spraying liquids for dust suppression; Industrial robots being machines; Agricultural seed planting machines, namely sowers; Blowing machines for the compression, sucking and carrying of grain; Saw machines; Chain saws; Electric scissors; Carburetor feeders being mechanical engine parts for land vehicles; Alternators; Grease rings being parts of machines; Ball rings for bearings for machines, namely, metal rings for holding ball bearings; Shaft couplings for machines; Axles for machines; Transmission shafts, other than for land vehicles; Connecting rods for machines, motors and engines; Reels for machines, namely, guide reels for paper reeling machines; Fuel taps in the nature of valves being parts of machines; Pumps as parts of machines, engines or motors; Self-regulating fuel pumps for use within Agricultural machines; Sparking plugs for internal combustion engines; Control cables for machines, engines or motors; Driving chains other than for land vehicles; Transmission chains other than for land vehicles; Grease boxes being parts of machines; Grease boxes namely, power-operated lubricant dispensers for machines; Journal boxes being parts of machines; Carburetors; Machine parts, namely, bearing housings; Crank shafts for pump control valves; Cylinders for motors and engines; Bearings, as parts of machines; Cylinder heads for motors and engines; Pump diaphragms; Clutches other than for land vehicles; Filters being parts of machines or engines; Igniting magnetos, namely, ignition magnetos for engines; Control mechanisms for machines, engines or motors, namely, start switch controls; Pistons being parts of machines or engines; Springs being parts of machines; Silencers for motors and engines; Hangers being parts of machines, namely, mounting hangers adapted for exhaust systems for internal combustion engines; Mounts being stands for machines; Valves being parts of machines; Gates being parts of machines, namely, gate valves; Ditchers being plows; Shaft couplings for machines; Machine couplings other than for land vehicles; Gears, other than for land vehicles; Blade holders being parts of machines; Ploughs; Sugar-making machines; Card clothing being parts of carding machines; Agricultural elevators | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LUIS CARLOS VALENCIA CANTILLO
- Other trademarks owned by LUIS CARLOS VALENCIA CANTILLO
- Other trademarks owned by YAOZHONG YE
- Other trademarks owned by YAOZHONG YE
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named BOSCO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2024 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 11, 2024 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2024 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2024 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 12, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2023 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2023 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 28, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 23, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |