USPTO serial 79306008
TECHLIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 6822967Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 23, 2022
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECHLIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin C. Brown
Kevin C. Brown Burr & Brown, PLLCP.O. Box 869Fayetteville, NY 13066UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine tools for treatment of materials and for manufacturing; cutting, drilling, abrading, sharpening and surface treatment machines; abrading tools being parts of machines; machines tools for cutting; machine tools for milling; recessing machine tools; mechanical tools for machine tools, namely, tool bits for machines; drilling machines; engines and powertrains, other than for land vehicles and machine parts for abrading machines, cutting machines, drilling machines, sharpening machines, surface treatment machines, milling machines, and recessing machines, and controls for the operation of abrading machines, cutting machines, drilling machines, sharpening machines, surface treatment machines, milling machines, and recessing machines and engines, other than for land vehicles; power drill chucks; tool holding fixtures, namely, power tool holders; machine tool holders; machine parts, namely, shrink chucks, extension for power tools; indexable insert drills; milling chucks and shrink chucks being parts of chip cutting machines; machines for tool setting and adjusting tools; modular couplings for machine tools; parts for all the aforesaid goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2025 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | NRCC | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 17, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 1, 2022 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 27, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |