USPTO serial 79306696
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID S. D'ASCENZO
DAVID S. D'ASCENZO DASCENZO GATES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW1000 SW BROADWAY, SUITE 1555PORTLAND, OR 97205UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications security, namely, providing secure user access to global computer networks relating to digital security, digital identity, identity based transactions, digital accreditation, user identification and digital credentials; message storage and transmission, namely, electronic store-and-forward messaging relating to digital security, digital identity, identity based transactions, digital accreditation, user identification and digital credentials; voice message storage services, namely, electronic store-and-forward messaging relating to digital security, digital identity, identity based transactions, digital accreditation, user identification and digital credentials; information, advisory and consultancy services in relation to the aforementioned services; including provision of all the aforementioned services electronically including via the internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer security services, namely, programming, installation, repair and maintenance of security software relating to digital security, digital identity, identity based transactions, digital accreditation, user identification and digital credentials; computer security services, namely, testing of computer software and updating of computer software relating to digital security, digital identity, identity based transactions, digital accreditation, user identification and digital credentials; computer security services, namely, restricting unauthorized network access by users without appropriate verification, accreditation or credentials; computer security services in the nature of providing authentication, issuance, validation and revocation of digital certificates; computer security engineering relating to computer security, digital security, digital identity, identity based transactions, digital accreditation, user identification and digital credentials; design and development of computer security software relating to computer security, digital security, digital identity, identity based transactions, digital accreditation, user identification and digital credentials | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 21, 2022 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2022 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2022 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 11, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |