Drawing for TRUSTGRID

USPTO serial 79306696

TRUSTGRID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUSTGRID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID S. D'ASCENZO

DAVID S. D'ASCENZO DASCENZO GATES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW1000 SW BROADWAY, SUITE 1555PORTLAND, OR 97205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunications security, namely, providing secure user access to global computer networks relating to digital security, digital identity, identity based transactions, digital accreditation, user identification and digital credentials; message storage and transmission, namely, electronic store-and-forward messaging relating to digital security, digital identity, identity based transactions, digital accreditation, user identification and digital credentials; voice message storage services, namely, electronic store-and-forward messaging relating to digital security, digital identity, identity based transactions, digital accreditation, user identification and digital credentials; information, advisory and consultancy services in relation to the aforementioned services; including provision of all the aforementioned services electronically including via the internetACTIVE—
042computer security services, namely, programming, installation, repair and maintenance of security software relating to digital security, digital identity, identity based transactions, digital accreditation, user identification and digital credentials; computer security services, namely, testing of computer software and updating of computer software relating to digital security, digital identity, identity based transactions, digital accreditation, user identification and digital credentials; computer security services, namely, restricting unauthorized network access by users without appropriate verification, accreditation or credentials; computer security services in the nature of providing authentication, issuance, validation and revocation of digital certificates; computer security engineering relating to computer security, digital security, digital identity, identity based transactions, digital accreditation, user identification and digital credentials; design and development of computer security software relating to computer security, digital security, digital identity, identity based transactions, digital accreditation, user identification and digital credentialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 11, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 11, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 11, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 11, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 1, 2023EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 21, 2022GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Oct 21, 2022GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Oct 21, 2022CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Sep 28, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 19, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 19, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 19, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 11, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2022OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 18, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 7, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 26, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Feb 25, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 28, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 4, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 4, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 16, 2021RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 16, 2021RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 15, 2021RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 14, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 19, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance