USPTO serial 79307215
INFINITY Q
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INFINITY Q?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LISA M MELANSON
LISA M MELANSON MCCARTHY TÉTRAULT LLP745 THURLOW STREETC/O SUITE 2400VANCOUVER BC, V6E0C5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers; computer hardware; recorded computer operating programs; downloadable computer operating programs; recorded computer operating system programs; downloadable computer operating system programs; recorded computer operating system software; downloadable computer operating system software; microchips for computer hardware | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware including integrated circuit design; design and development of computer software; design and development of computer systems including computer operating system design; computer software consultancy; computer systems integration services; rental of computer hardware; rental of computer software; rental of computer peripherals | ABANDONED | — |
| 045 | Licensing of computer software; licensing of computer hardware designs such as integrated circuit designs, being a form of intellectual property; licensing of computer system designs such as computer operating system designs, being a form of intellectual property | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by infinityQ Technology Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by infinityQ Technology Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named INFINITY Q
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |