USPTO serial 79307296
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
Douglas R. Wolf Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.600 Atlantic AvenueBoston, MA 02210UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic body care preparations; skin and body care products, namely, face moisturizers, body moisturizers, and face anti-aging treatments in the nature of anti-aging moisturizer and anti-aging creams; body anti-aging products, namely, body anti-aging creams, lotions, gels, oils, cleaners, body bath soap, peels, moisturizers, skin conditioners, skin emollients and wrinkle removing skin care preparations; non-medicated topical neck skin treatments, namely, lotions, creams, gels, oils, cleaners, peels, moisturizers, skin conditioners, skin emollients and wrinkle removing skin care preparations for the neck; non-medicated stretch mark skin treatments, namely, lotions, creams, gels, oils, cleaners, peels, moisturizers, skin conditioners, skin emollients and wrinkle removing skin care preparations for the treatment of skin stretch marks; non-medicated cellulite skin treatments, namely, lotions, creams, gels, oils, cleaners, moisturizers, skin conditioners for cellulite reduction; skin whitening and/or brightening treatments, namely, lotions, creams, gels, oils, cleaners, moisturizers, skin conditioners for skin whitening and skin brightening; hair care products, namely, hair sprays, hair care lotions, hair conditioners and hair gel; cosmetics; cleaning preparations, bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use, namely, laundry bleach, laundry detergents and laundry wax; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soaps, namely, antiperspirant soaps, body cosmetic soaps, bath soap and non-medicated hand soap; essential oils, hair lotions; dentifrices, face and body creams, body washes, shampoos, body moisturizers, cologne; eau de parfum; perfumes; deodorant for personal use; room fragrances, fragrances | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2025 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 7, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |