USPTO serial 79307322
NEXT TECHNIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEXT TECHNIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Sigalow
David L. Sigalow Allen, Dyer, Doppelt & Gilchrist, P.A.255 S. Orange AvenueSuite 1401Orlando, FL 32801Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Advisory services relating to computer software; application service provider (asp) services; computer system analysis; computer software advisory services; computer software consultancy; computer software design; computer software development; computer software engineering; computer software programming services; consultancy in the design and development of computer software; computer support services (computer hardware, software and peripherals advisory and information services); computer support services (programming and software installation, repair and maintenance services); design of computer software; development of computer based networks; development of computer programmes; development of computer software; development of computer software application solutions; development of software; hosting of software as a service (saas); creating and designing website-based indexes of information for others (information technology services); information technology (it) consultancy; information technology (it) services (computer hardware, software and peripherals design and technical consultancy); installation and maintenance of computer software; installation of computer software; installation of middleware (software); installation, repair and maintenance of middleware (software); maintenance of computer programs; maintenance of computer software; modifying of computer programs; online provision of web-based applications (non-downloadable); online provision of web-based software (non-downloadable); platform as a service (paas); preparation of reports relating to computer programs; providing information relating to computer technology and programming via a web site; providing information, including online, about design and development of computer hardware and software; provision of information relating to computer programming; provision of information relating to computer programs; provision of information relating to information technology; provision of online non-downloadable software (application service provider); provision of online non-downloadable web-based software; provision of technical information in relation to computers; research relating to computer programming; research relating to computers; software as a service (saas); software creation; software development in the framework of software publishing; software engineering; testing of computer programs; updating of computer software; upgrading of computer software; writing of computer programs; writing of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |