Drawing for KP ELITE

USPTO serial 79307987

KP ELITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KP ELITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven M. Espenshade

Steven M. Espenshade Pirkey Barber PLLC1801 East 6th Street, Suite 300Austin, TX 78702United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Packaging materials, namely films made of plastic for food packaging; plastic films used as a packaging wrap for food products for commercial useACTIVE—
017Plastics in extruded form for use in manufacture for food packaging; plastic film for food packing and stuffing, but not for wrappingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 31, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 30, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 30, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 30, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 30, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 16, 2023EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 25, 2023RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Apr 5, 2023GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2023GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2023CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 6, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 7, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2022CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Nov 17, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 22, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2022OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 6, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 6, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2022CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 7, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 7, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 7, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 7, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 7, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 5, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 29, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 30, 2021RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2021RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 27, 2021RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 26, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 5, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance