USPTO serial 79308259
VITTO. IN LOVE WITH FOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 405
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GULIANO, ROBERT N
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VITTO. IN LOVE WITH FOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Judith L. Grubner
848 Dodge, #337Evanston, IL 60202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fruit, preserved; processed fruits; fruit chips; meat; vegetable jellies; eggs; fruit jams; nut-based food bars; dried fruit-based snacks; snack mixes consisting of dehydrated fruit and processed nuts; milk beverages containing fruits; vegetables, preserved; cooked vegetables; jams; marmalades; milk; flavoured milk; beverages made from milk; olive oil for food; edible oils; vegetable oils for food; cooking oil; oils for food; salad oil; potato chips | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Hot sauce; picante sauce; pesto sauce; pasta sauce; cheese sauce; artichoke sauce; spaghetti sauce; tomato-based sauces; tomato sauce; fresh pasta; dried pasta; rice; prepared pasta; pasta; condiment, namely, pepper sauce; honey; corn-based chips; flour-based chips; cooked rice; rice chips; rice crackers; rice flour; flour for food; cereal-based snack foods; cereal-based snack bars; biscuits; tarts; cakes made with cereals; coffee; beverages made of coffee; vinegar; edible spices; noodles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2022 | TRPT | REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION PROCESSED - TOTAL | — |
| Jul 4, 2022 | ERFT | TEAS REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 3, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 16, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 15, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2021 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |