USPTO serial 79308417
COMMUNIC8
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMMUNIC8?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audiovisual apparatus; communication apparatus; communication devices; communication devices for linking computer networks; communication installations; communication software; communications carriers; communications networks; communications processing computer software; communications programmes; communications systems; computer communication apparatus; computer databases; computer design hardware; computer installations for the communication of data; computer programs for use in communications; computer software for business purposes; computer software for communication between computer processes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Advisory services relating to computer software; computer network services; computer program advisory services; computer programming; computer programming consultancy; computer software consultancy; computer software development; design and development of computer software for others; development of computer programmes; development of computer software; development of computer software application solutions; information technology (it) consultancy; platform as a service (paas); software creation; software as a service (saas); provision of online non-downloadable software (application service provider); user authentication services using single sign-on technology for online software applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 20, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |