Drawing for SBW

USPTO serial 79309369

SBW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SBW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BENITA J. ROHM

BENITA J. ROHM ROHM & MONSANTO, PLC22620 POINTE DRIVEST. CLAIR SHORES, MI 48081UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Watches, watch partsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 4, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2023MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 4, 2023ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 4, 2023OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 4, 2023OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Dec 12, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 29, 2022OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 22, 2022OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2022OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Oct 17, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 28, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2022OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2022ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 24, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2022OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 15, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 1, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 1, 2021RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2021RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 28, 2021RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 27, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 23, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance