USPTO serial 79309375
TIGER SINCE 1932 WORLD ACCLAIMED CRYSTAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 19, 2021
- Examiner
- NEPTUNE, EVONNE MARIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with TIGER SINCE 1932 WORLD ACCLAIMED CRYSTAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent E. Routman
Brent E. Routman Merchant & Gould150 South 5th Street, Suite 2200P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer; ale; lager; stout; porter; non-alcoholic malt beverages; mineral and aerated waters; non-alcoholic beer, ale, lager, stout and porter; fruit drinks and fruit juices; alcoholic and non-alcoholic beer, ale, lager, stout or porter based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HEINEKEN ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by HEINEKEN ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by HEINEKEN ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named TIGER SINCE 1932 WORLD ACCLAIMED CRYSTAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 18, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 17, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |