USPTO serial 79309827
HAYO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HAYO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRADLEY D CROSE
BRADLEY D CROSE CROSE LAW LLC112 NORTHBROOKE TRACEWOODSTOCK, GA 30188UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunication in the nature of providing access to the internet, internet access provider services, internet service provider services, telephone services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2022 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2021 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Aug 22, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 25, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 24, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |