USPTO serial 79309835
ANAGITAL ANA·GITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, CAMERON L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ANAGITAL ANA·GITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hun Joon Kim
Hun Joon Kim LEX IP Meister, PLLC.5180 Parkstone Drive, Suite 175Chantilly, VA 20151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for recording images; computer styluses; data processing apparatus; electronic pens; light pens; scanners being data processing equipment; downloadable software for optical character recognition; sound recording apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Adhesive note paper; book-cover paper; calendered paper; copy paper; memo pads; notebook paper; paper; printing paper; stationery; stickers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2024 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |