Drawing for STEMXPAND

USPTO serial 79309898

STEMXPAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PASSMAN, NICOLE A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STEMXPAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical apparatus and instruments for use in cellular therapy, medical apparatus for cell cultivation, medical instruments for cell cultivation, medical apparatus and devices intended for cell separation techniquesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 26, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 1, 2022CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jul 4, 2022CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 3, 2022LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 30, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 29, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 14, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 14, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 24, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 25, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 1, 2021RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2021RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 4, 2021RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 3, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 5, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 3, 2021LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2021SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance