Drawing for NEO EBMPAPST

USPTO serial 79310115

NEO EBMPAPST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEO EBMPAPST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

W. R. Duke Taylor / Geoffrey D. Aurini

W. R. Duke Taylor / Geoffrey D. Aurini Harness, Dickey & Piece, P.L.C.5445 Corporate DriveSuite 200Troy, MI 48098

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric motor operated pumps; dust separatorsACTIVE—
009Power supplies; Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning, Lighting control and regulating apparatus for buildingsACTIVE—
036Arranging the provision of finance, including, financing of purchasesACTIVE—
042Research and development of new products for others; research and development in the field of digitalisationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2023FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2023FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2022MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 14, 2022ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 13, 2022EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2022CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jul 20, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 17, 2022CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 13, 2022LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jun 23, 2022AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 13, 2022PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2021ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Dec 1, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 21, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 1, 2021RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2021RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 29, 2021RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 28, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 10, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 8, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance