USPTO serial 79310522
ARKIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARKIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William C. Wright
William C. Wright Epstein Drangel LLP60 East 42nd Street, Suite 1250New York, NY 10165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair masks; hairstyling masks; hair care masks; hair sprays; hair styling sprays; hair nourishers; hair care preparations; hair lotions; hair pomade; hair shampoos; hair conditioners; hair creams; hair colourants; hair straightening preparations; hair curling preparations; hair oils; non-medicated hair serums; non-medicated soaps; perfumery; essential oils; non-medicated cosmetics; shaving preparations; cosmetics; bath oils; massage oils; hand creams, body lotions, eau de cologne; perfume; aftershave; cosmetic kits comprised of make-up; make-up preparations; make-up removing preparations; household fragrances; air fragrance reed diffusers | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Candles; perfumed candles; table candles; scented candles; fragranced candles; aromatherapy fragrance candles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Arkive Headcare Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Matrix APA (UK) Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Matrix APA (UK) Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named ARKIVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 13, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 10, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |