USPTO serial 79311065
VWL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VWL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN ALUMIT
JOHN ALUMIT ALUMIT IP135 S JACKSON ST STE 200GLENDALE, CA 91205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Backpacks; leather bags; shoulder bags; sports bags; handbags; briefcases; travelling bags; evening bags; beach bags; key bags; hiking bags; bum bags; walking sticks; school bags; wallets; reins for guiding children; umbrellas; travelling trunks; leather, unworked or semi-worked | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Hats; shoes; waterproof clothing, namely, waterproof jackets and pants; clothing layettes; shirts; T-shirts; pants; jackets; coats; dresses; skirts; sports jerseys; sweaters; suits; overcoats; underwear; uniforms; waistcoats; hosiery; gloves as clothing; belts being clothing; scarfs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wenzhou Weiou Trading Firm
- Other trademarks owned by Wenzhou Weiou Trading Firm
- Other trademarks owned by ZHEJIANG RED DRAGONFLY FOOTWEAR CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named VWL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 31, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2022 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 19, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2021 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |