USPTO serial 79311906
BRENTOSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARR, PATRICK C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRENTOSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Administration of business affairs; business advice relating to marketing; business consultancy; business consultancy relating to the administration of information technology; business data analysis services; business management; business management of outsourcing; management of business offices for others; outsourcing services (business assistance); outsourced administrative management for companies; personnel management consultancy; personnel recruitment; data management; human resource management; office administration services (for others); company management (for others); design of marketing material; marketing; production of video recordings for marketing purposes; search engine optimisation | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Programming services for search engine optimisation; technological advisory services; information technology (it) consultancy; information technology (it) services (computer hardware, software and peripherals design and technical consultancy); information technology services provided on an outsourcing basis; remote monitoring of computer systems; computer software design; computer software development; advisory services relating to computer software; computer support services (computer hardware, software and peripherals advisory and information services); computer support services (programming and software installation, repair and maintenance services); consultancy in the design and development of computer software; software as a service (saas); graphic design services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 2, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |