USPTO serial 79312002
UNIKUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARMON, RAYMOND E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNIKUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software; cloud computing software; digital solutions provider [DSP] software; product engineering software; application development software; data and file management and database software; application server software; web application and server software; server software; development environment software; application software for cloud computing services; application simulation software; computer software platforms; software reliability software; web server software; cloud server software; computer software platforms, recorded or downloadable; collaboration software platforms [software]; real-time collaborative editing [RTCE] platforms [software]; revision control platforms [software]; collaboration management software platforms | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research; IT services, namely, development, testing, programming, implementation, maintenance and updating of computer software and consultancy relating to the application and use of computer software; writing of software for information technology [IT] consultancy, in the fields of management and administration of IT-infrastructure, application development; installation and actualisation of programs for data processing, in the fields of management and administration of IT-infrastructure, application development; hosting provider services; application service provider services, namely, hosting computer software applications of others; hosting platforms on the Internet and web portals; hosting of transaction and communication platforms on the Internet; software as a service [SaaS]; consulting services in the field of software as a service [SaaS]; rental of software; providing temporary use of web-based software; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software development tools; IT consultancy, advisory and information services; application service provider services; conducting technical project studies; technical support and consultancy with regard to the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |