USPTO serial 79312114
BREEVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, JUSTIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BREEVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nazly Aileen Bayramoglu
Nazly Aileen Bayramoglu Bayramoglu Law Offices LLC1540 West Warm Springs Road, Suite 100Henderson, NV 89014UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Cooking utensils, electric, namely, microwave ovens for cooking, electric cooking pots, electric toasters; electric grills; refrigerators; air-conditioning installations; air-conditioning apparatus; air purifying apparatus and machines; electric fans for personal use; electric hair drier; humidifiers for household purposes; electric drinking water dispensers; water purifying apparatus and machines; disinfectant apparatus, namely, apparatus for disinfecting water, disinfecting ultraviolet lamps, mobile hand-disinfection stations, disinfection apparatus for surface disinfection | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2024 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2022 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |