USPTO serial 79312125
OBJECTIV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARMON, RAYMOND E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OBJECTIV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Open-source software; machine learning software used in computer predictive analytics programs; database management software; software development kit [sdk]; cloud software; artificial intelligence software; computer software for data processing; computer programs for data processing; machine learning software; data processing software; computer software applications for use with artificial intelligence; computer software to automate data warehousing; data feeders for use with artificial intelligence; data loggers; data processing programs; data processing systems; data processors; machine learning software for analysis; software for the analysis of business data; software for use in the evaluation and analysis of data utilizing machine learning | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service [SaaS]; development of data processing software; software as a service [SaaS] featuring software for machine learning, deep learning and deep neural networks; software as a service [SaaS] featuring software for machine learning; design and development of software for database management; design and development of computer software for database management; design and development of computer software for data processing; design and development of data processing systems; design and development of programs for data processing; design and development of software for database management; design and development of systems for data input, output, processing, display and storage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 15, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |