USPTO serial 79312285
SWEET TALK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SWEET TALK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Boiled sweets; chocolate sweets; foamed sugar sweets; mint based sweets (non-medicated); non-medicated chewing sweets; non-medicated gum sweets; non-medicated sweets; peppermint sweets; cake decorations made of candy; candy (not medicated); candy apples; candy bars; candy cake; candy coated confections; candy decorations for cakes; candy mints; candy, other than for medical purposes; caramels (candy); chocolate candy with fillings; corn candy; ice candy; non-medicated candy; sweetmeats (candy); sugar free confectionary (not for medical purposes); ice lollies; iced lollies; hand made candies; hard caramels (candies); mints (candies, non-medicated); non-medicated candies; non-medicated sugar candies | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Pharmacy retail services; retail services; retail services featuring utility services of others; retail services relating to bakery products; discount services (retail, wholesale, or sales promotion services); online retail services; online retail services for downloadable digital music | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Advisory services relating to catering; booking of catering services; business catering services; catering services; catering services for the provision of coffee for offices; charitable services, namely, providing food and drink catering; contract catering services; food and drink catering; hotel catering services; mobile catering services; office catering services for the provision of coffee | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 5, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2022 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 5, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |