Drawing for KRAMER INSIGHT360

USPTO serial 79312386

KRAMER INSIGHT360

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
NEHMER, JASON ROBERT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KRAMER INSIGHT360?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009A cloud or on premises software-based platform for audio-visual deployment management and central monitoring usability, enabling effective and intuitive interface management of a multiplicity of audio and video devices, sources and destinations, situated in classrooms, boardrooms, conference rooms and auditoriums, and for providing remote access, diagnosis and upgrading of such devices and sourcesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 2023FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 9, 2023FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 9, 2023FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 27, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 9, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 9, 2022OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 9, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 9, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 1, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 15, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 28, 2021RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 28, 2021RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 2, 2021RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 1, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 11, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 7, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 3, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance