USPTO serial 79312502
SHAVIDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHAVIDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Houses of metal; metal buildings | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Non-metallic houses; wooden houses; non-metallic buildings | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Real estate affairs; property sales services relating to property development | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Property development (building and construction services); building and construction of real estate subdivisions and developments; building construction advisory services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Building design services; architectural consultation; architectural services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sekisui House Services (QLD) Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SHAVIDA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |