Drawing for ARTEMIS EFOILER

USPTO serial 79312804

ARTEMIS EFOILER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARTEMIS EFOILER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Lyon

John L. Lyon Thomas | Horstemeyer LLP3200 Windy Hill Rd. SESuite 1600EAtlanta, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric propulsion mechanisms for water vehicles, namely, motors and engines for hydrofoil boats and ships; marine propulsion units, namely, motors and engines for hydrofoil boats and shipsACTIVE—
012Hydrofoils for speed boats; hydrofoils for boatsACTIVE—
037Machinery retrofit and conversion services, namely, installation of environmentally friendly propulsion systems; shipbuilding, namely, building of water vessels with hydrofoils; custom shipbuilding, namely, custom shipbuilding of water vessels with hydrofoils; providing information relating to shipbuilding of water vessels with hydrofoilsACTIVE—
039Marine transport services using vessels with hydrofoilsACTIVE—
042Design services in the field of naval shipbuilding namely, the design of hydrofoil marine vessels; marine vehicle design, namely, the design of hydrofoil marine vessels; ship design, namely, the design of hydrofoil marine vesselsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 23, 2026GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
May 23, 2026GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
May 23, 2026CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Apr 1, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2026ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 9, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 3, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 3, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 2, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2024ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2024GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 5, 2024GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 5, 2024CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 19, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 28, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 4, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2022OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 22, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 21, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 21, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 5, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2021RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2021RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 15, 2021RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 15, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 14, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance