USPTO serial 79312806
HOFFMANN GREEN CEMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAZICH, JOAN MICHELE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOFFMANN GREEN CEMENT TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle L. Visser
Michelle L. Visser Fishman Stewart PLLC800 Tower Drive, Suite 610Troy, MI 48098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Environmentally friendly chemical compositions for use as binding agents for the construction industry; environmentally friendly glues for industrial purposes for use in construction | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Bricks; tiles and slabs, not of metal, for construction; tiles not of metal; wall claddings, not of metal, for building; cement for construction; mortars for construction; all these materials are environmentally friendly | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Treatment of materials in the nature of cement and concrete for use in the construction industry; all of the foregoing services being environmentally friendly | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |