USPTO serial 79313031
CARING UP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARING UP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Application software; automatic emergency reporting devices; communication devices; connecting devices for data transfer; computer hardware; computer software; computer software applications, downloadable; computer software packages; computer software platforms; computer software products; computer software programs; data storage devices; electrical devices for security purposes, other than for vehicles; measuring devices, electric; personal protection devices [electronic alarms]; personnel tracking devices; protection devices for personal use against accidents; smartwatches; software; software and applications for mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider [ASP] services; cloud computing; computer programming; computer system analysis; computer system design; data encryption services; design and development of computer hardware and software; design and development of new technology for others; design and development of software in the field of mobile applications; design, maintenance, development and updating of computer software; electronic data storage; hosting computer sites [web sites]; information technology services; installation of computer software; monitoring of computer systems by remote access; monitoring of computer systems to detect breakdowns; platform as a service [PaaS]; providing information about the design and development of computer software, systems and networks; rental of computer software; rental of web servers; research and development of new products for others; software as a service [SaaS]; technological consultancy; troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems; updating of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |