USPTO serial 79313244
G GELT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with G GELT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TAMAR NIV BESSINGER
TAMAR NIV BESSINGER FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC151 WEST 42ND STREET, 17TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Issuance of vouchers, tokens and coupons for the payment of goods and services of others; Issuance of cash vouchers for the payment of goods and services of others; Issuance of cash vouchers for use as money; Providing rebates at participating establishments of others through use of a membership card; Payment processing in relation to customer loyalty schemes, namely, loyalty program payment processing services; Processing of cash, namely, cash withdrawal and depositing of cash; Issuance of tokens of value in relation to customer loyalty schemes; Conducting of financial operations online, namely, e-wallet payment services; Issuance of gift cards, namely, issuing stored value cards; Cash card services, namely, cash card payment processing services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2024 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 11, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2022 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 27, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 9, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 6, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |