USPTO serial 79313755
O SPRING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 401
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with O SPRING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott Greenberg
Scott Greenberg Culhane Meadows PLLC13101 Preston Road, Ste. 110-1520Culhane Meadows Nat'l IP Support CtrDallas, TX 75240Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Holding devices of metal for holding bags or sacks, namely, metal flanges, metal handles, metal hooks, metal clips, revolving metal holders for holding multiple bags or sacks, metal vacuum cups for holding and securing trash bags and sacks, tools bags and sacks, cosmetics bags and sacks, bathroom articles bags and sacks, general purpose bags and sacks; metal clamps for spanning bags or sacks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Holding devices not of metal for holding bags or sacks, namely, non-metal flanges, non-metal handles, non-metal hooks, non-metal clips, revolving non-metal holders for holding multiple bags or sacks, non-metal vacuum cups for holding and securing trash bags and sacks, tools bags and sacks, cosmetics bags and sacks, bathroom articles bags and sacks, general purpose bags and sacks; non-metal clamps for spanning bags or sacks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 14, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |