USPTO serial 79314277
IWIS DID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IWIS DID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa C. Pavento
Lisa C. Pavento Meunier Carlin & Curfman LLC999 Peachtree St. NESuite 1300Atlanta, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Chains for machines, namely, industrial chains, in particular roller chains, roller chains with sawtooth plates, double pitch roller chains, maintenance-free roller chains, corrosion-resistant roller chains, side bow chains, grip chains, accumulation chains, roller chains with vulcanized elastomer profiles, transfer chains, conveyor chains, hollow pin chains, push-pull chains, plate chains, pin oven chains, tube conveyor chains, leaf chains, multiflex chains, case conveyor chains, plate top chains, plastic, steel and stainless steel flat top chains; chains being parts of agricultural machines, in particular harvester chains, straw elevator chains, scraper chains, gathering chains, corn harvester chains, bucket elevator chains, rough conveyor chains, leaf chains; timing drive mechanism consisting primarily of silent chains; timing drive mechanism consisting primarily of inverted tooth chains with rocker pin joints; timing drive mechanism consisting primarily of inverted tooth chains with single pin joints; timing drive mechanism consisting primarily of bush chains; timing drive mechanism consisting primarily of roller chains; timing drive mechanism consisting primarily of plate wheels, and sprockets with taper-lock bushes; Machine parts, namely, sprockets for flat top chains; Machine parts, namely, chain tensioning wheels with ball bearings; machine components for chain drive, namely, chain tensioners, chain couplings, chain tensioning wheels with ball bearings, friction torque limiters, sliding hubs; all above-mentioned goods made of metal, plastic and/or fibre composites, as well as parts of all the above-mentioned chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Parts of land vehicles other than parts of motors and engines, namely, roller chains, roller chains with sawtooth plates, double pitch roller chains, maintenance-free roller chains, corrosion-resistant roller chains, side bow chains, grip chains, accumulation chains, roller chains with vulcanized elastomer profiles, transfer chains, conveyor chains, hollow pin chains, push-pull chains, plate chains, pin oven chains, tube conveyor chains, leaf chains, multiflex chains, case conveyor chains, plate top chains, plastic, steel and stainless steel flat top chains, harvester chains, straw elevator chains, scraper chains, gathering chains, corn harvester chains, bucket elevator chains, rough conveyor chains, inverted tooth chains, inverted tooth chains with rocker pin joints, inverted tooth chains with single pin joints, bush chains, sprockets, chain tensioning systems, roller chains, tensioning and guide rails, sprocket wheels, sprockets with taper-lock bushes, sprockets for flat top chains, chain tensioning wheels with ball-bearings; all above-mentioned goods made of metal, plastic and/or fibre composites, as well as parts of all above-mentioned chains | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 3, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |