USPTO serial 79314505
PING PONG FURY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PING PONG FURY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER J RIEBLING
PETER J RIEBLING Riebling IP, PLLC1717 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 1025WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer game programs; Downloadable video game programs; downloadable software for playing videos and on-line games; Downloadable interactive computer game programs; downloadable computer game software via a global computer network; Downloadable computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones, handheld computers, computers, video game consoles and other wireless devices, both handheld and free standing; Downloadable software for virtual currency and crypto currency, namely downloadable software which enables users to purchase and trade virtual currency and crypto currency; Downloadable application software for playing video games; Downloadable software for enabling video, computer and on-line games to be run on multiple platforms; downloadable software for developing, designing, modifying and customizing video, computer and on-line games; computer peripherals; mouse pads; Downloadable audio visual games software for use on computer hardware platforms | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Handheld electronic games adapted for use with television receivers only; playing cards; home video game machines for use in connection with computer hardware platforms; hand-held units for playing electronic games; home video game machines and hand-held video game machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games, providing online video games accessed and played via electronic, wireless and computer networks; Providing online non-downloadable computer games that may be accessed network-wide by network users; Providing on-line multi-user computer games via local computer networks, global computer networks and the Internet; Providing online non-downloadable computer and video games accessed and played on electronic, wireless, and computer networks; Providing online non-downloadable computer and video games accessed by or for use on mobile and cellular telephones and other wireless devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |