USPTO serial 79314700
ATLAZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CERDA, VICTOR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ATLAZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware, firmware and software; application software in the field of mobile operating systems (mobile app); communication software to enable customers to access their bank account information and to process bank transactions; data loggers, namely, computer hardware and software for data collection and maintenance; computer hardware and software for database management; electronic publications (downloadable) provided on-line from databases or the Internet; downloadable software for instant messaging and electronic mail services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial affairs; monetary affairs; financial management; capital investment; insurance services; provident fund services; real estate affairs; provision of financial advice relating to tax planning; charitable fundraising services; banking, financial and insurance services; services provided by consultants in the field of financial planning; services provided by consultants, research and information relating to financial affairs; provision of financial information; provision of financial information via websites; provision of funding for the development of new technologies; computerized financial services; conducting of financial transactions; financial evaluation and analysis; investment, real estate and financial asset management; management of financial assets; financial advisory services relating to securities, derivatives and other financial products; financial sponsorship of entertainment activities; financial evaluation services; provision of information and analysis via the Internet in the field of financial investments; financial services provided by electronic means; financing of projects; financial research | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |